IP4PI – Independent Physicians for Patient independence, is proud to announce the launch of our Rumble video channel outreach to patients and physicians across the U.S. and around the world.
As establishment-controlled social media outlets increasingly censor, cancel, and silence voices who are speaking out in support of COVID early treatment and vaccine safety, it is crucial to utilize alternate venues that support our First Amendment rights to free speech and assembly.
Please visit our channel at https://rumble.com/user/IP4PI, watch our latest videos, and be sure to click the green “SUBSCRIBE” button so you will be one of the first to be notified of our latest postings.
College and university deadlines for religious and medical exemptions may be July 15 or August 1. Consider the following text to college President or Dean if religious exemption sought:
Dear President or Dean,
As per college or university policy, please accept my urgent request for religious exemption from experimental COVID19 vaccination so I may immediately return to campus. My personal religious beliefs and personal relationship with G-d are violated by college or university policy mandating mRNA and DNA COVID19 experimental VACCINES for the following reasons:
1. I cannot accept any product of human fetal experimentation such as the mRNA and DNA vaccines.
2. I cannot allow my body to be violated by an intervention where I am forced to make foreign proteins.
3. My body is a unit, created by G-d, with an immune system that defends me against viruses.
4. I cannot allow my body, spirit, health, to be violated by an experimental product that can cause unacceptable risk of disease and death as a side effect.
5. College or university policy violates the United States Constitution to not allow my free expression of my religion and relationship with G-d.
Please urgently exempt me from college or university policy violate my religion and personal relationship with God as detailed above.
Score a victory for patient rights and evidence-based medicine! The College of Charleston was planning to implement onerous rules on unvaccinated students, like mandatory COVID testing protocols.
Students and parents fought back and speaking out can make a difference!
After receiving a large volume of complaints, the South Carolina Attorney General told the school to case and desist both direct and indirect violations of the State’s prohibition on vaccine passports.
FITSNews reports: “In a letter to CofC president Andrew Hsu dated July 6, 2021, [Attorney General] Wilson wrote that the school’s policies ‘could be read to imply that an unvaccinated student (who) refuses to participate in a survey and monthly testing protocols may be subject to a reprimand, the harshness of which is unclear.'”
“It is a well understood principle of law that what cannot be done directly, likewise, cannot be done indirectly either,” writes AG Wilson, reiterating that heavy handed rules for unvaccinated students likely constitute a defacto vaccine mandate contrary to South Carolina law.
This just in from eminent C19 pathologist Dr. Roger Hodgkinson:
Two papers published prior to COVID, and one with solid immunoflourescence experiments, demonstrated that lipid nanoparticles could have been expected to be taken up at high concentrations in the ovaries. In the animals (Merien et al), the concentration was so high the ovaries literally “glowed” at the time of dissection.
This suggests that Pfizer and Moderna and the regulatory agencies either knew or should have known, vaccines using lipid nanoparticles could threaten fertility and gynecological health if the particles carried a payload of mRNA coding for the dangerous GOF Wuhan Spike protein.
As a family physician, medical reporter, independent practice doctor who sees patients and helped pioneer COVID19 early treatment protocols, there are many things you must consider. First, natural immunity following COVID infection must be recognized as contributing toward herd immunity. People with natural immunity should be exempted from receiving COVID New Vaccines since they are contraindicated as they may cause potentially severe disease in the form of antibody-dependent enhancement, the worst of which won’t be seen for years. Second, the vaccine experiment is not for everyone, but should be reserved for those at highest risk over 70 years old and in nursing homes. Vaccine risk to healthy adults, children, and pregnant women far outweighs any possible benefit. Third, the principle of bodily autonomy and informed consent were never properly executed for anyone receiving this experimental intervention. Therefore, pharmaceutical industry should be 100% responsible for any adverse outcomes, monetarily and legally. Informed consent must be thoroughly and completely detailed and documented for all involved immediately. Fourth, these so-called vaccines have unproven long-term safety and should not become approved for use at this time until years of study can be completed, Last, because early treatment works and was blocked by nefarious corporations, hospitals, pharmaceutical manufacturers, media, and government entities, the emergency use authorization EUA for vaccines and Remdesivir should be immediately withdrawn. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Best Health Craig M. Wax DO Family physician Independent physicians for patient independence IP4PI
I’ve long felt that administrative tribunals set up to judge the validity of a vaccine exemption are precisely this: practicing medicine without a license. CA has been doing this with childhood vaccinations for some time, increasingly squeezing and attempting to strong-arm physicians who write exemptions. It is wrong.
These tribunals also violate CA law by practicing medicine without having done what the law calls a “good faith medical evaluation,” which I am sure is likewise required by other state’s laws. What they actually do is slavishly apply some list that the CDC published to specific cases. But there is no reason to believe that the CDC list is comprehensive, given the individual variation and patient-specific factors that are found everywhere in medicine. It is in part because each patient is unique that physicians — until recently — are generally granted wide discretionary latitude in patient care.
Practice guidelines published by the CDC or professional societies are not recipe books for the practice of medicine. They are general guidelines, nothing more. Clinical prudence is always required to apply evidence and principles to specific cases, and no guidelines are sufficiently comprehensive to cover all cases or include all statistical outliers. What we see here represents an egregious example of a trend in medicine toward homogenization that will not have salutary consequences.
For most email apps, clicking here will open a new message. Feel free to customize the template wording to your liking. After you’re happy with it, add your name at the bottom and send.
If the above link doesn’t work for you, template text is provided below:
Subject: No Vaccine Mandate
Dear President Holloway,
I respectfully ask you to reconsider and reverse the COVID vaccine mandate being imposed on Rutgers students wishing to return to in person learning.
Although, at first glance, the policy may seem prudent, it coerces students into bearing unneeded and unknown risk and is at heart contrary to the bedrock medical principle of informed consent. Also, a blanket mandate will harm many college students, including those who have already had COVID-19, those who are pregnant, those with coagulopathies and many more with short term and long term health consequences.
For additional medical, ethical, and legal reasons the mandate should be reversed, I urge you to read the following letters from doctors and attorneys who have closely analyzed the issue.
As more Colleges and Universities announce their misguided plans to require students receive COVID-19 vaccines before returning to in-person learning, the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons is speaking out to ask these schools to reverse their unscientific and unethical mandates.
Dear Deans, Governing Boards and Trustees,
On behalf of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, I am writing to ask you to reconsider your new policy mandating COVID-19 vaccination of students prior to returning to campus.[i] Institutions of higher learning are divided on this issue.[ii] ,[iii] Although, at first glance, the policy may seem prudent, it coerces students into bearing unneeded and unknown risk and is at heart contrary to the bedrock medical principle of informed consent.
There are multiple reasons to reverse your policy. I ask you to consider the following:
By Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas TX
There is considerable attention on the potential to be infected a second or third or fourth time with SARS-CoV-2 and be hospitalized over and over again with COVID-19. Thankfully, at over 110 million cases worldwide, we have not seen thousands of rehospitalizations. In fact, reports of possible recurrence are very rare, yet are used as public health rationale for COVID-19 recovered patients to undergo vaccination with its intendant risks including death.
A recent case from France reported that a 58-year-old man had a brief illness with a positive SARS-CoV-2 nasal PCR test in September 2020 and then was infected with the South African variant 501Y.V2 strain in January 2021 and was hospitalized and required mechanical ventilation. Although details are not given, when the nasal PCR test is run at cycle thresholds >35 ct, the test picks up pieces of RNA in the nasal secretions from influenza and other viral fragments. Since the patient is 58 and has asthma, the September illness was almost certainly not COVID-19, since in a man his age and with asthma COVID-19 will last for 14 to 30 days or more. His first and real COVID-19 illness occurred in January 2021.