The final MACRA rule expands exemptions, flexibility, claims ModernHealthCare.com but it is still byzantine and unworkable. Patients lose.
The 2,398 page rule can be downloaded here: https://qpp.cms.gov/docs/CMS-5517-FC.pdf
We haven’t read the all 2,398 pages yet but here are a few initial notes:
- The low-volume threshold is now < $30,000 in Part B billings OR < 100 Part B Patients.The proposed rule was < $10,000 AND < 100 Patients.
- The infamous table from the proposed rule showing 87% of solo docs would face a negative adjustment under MIPS has been “bleached.” The sanitized table no longer lists solo physicians separately, and claims that only 10% of practices from 1 to 9 physicians will will face negative adjustment. Click here for image combining both new table and old table. Supposedly, overall, 94.7% of eligible clinicians will get a positive or neutral adjustment with 5.3% receiving a negative adjustment.
Another trouble spot to look out for (Page 1513):
“One commenter supported the inclusion of ABMS board certification and participation in Maintenance of Certification (MOC) Programs on Physician Compare. Another commenter recommended MOC participation as a measure in future rulemaking as part of quality performance data publicly reported on Physician Compare … We appreciate the points, concerns, and suggestions raised by commenters and, if feasible and appropriate under the statute, we may possibly consider these issues in future rulemaking. ”
Some other low-lights:
“We disagree with commenters who maintained that the disclosure of PHI to ONC or an ONC-ACB (authorized certification body) could be inconsistent with reasonable privacy or other organizational policies or would otherwise be an unjustified invasion of privacy or any other interest. As noted, the disclosure of this information would be authorized by law on the basis that it is a disclosure to a health oversight agency (ONC) for the purpose of determining compliance with a federal program (the ONC Health IT Certification Program). In addition, we note that any further disclosure of PHI by an ONC-ACB or ONC would be limited to disclosures authorized by law, such as under the federal Privacy Act of 1974, or the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), as applicable.” (page 67)
Data-Collection from all-payers:
“In addition, we are finalizing our approach of including all-payer data for the QCDR, qualified registry, and EHR submission mechanisms because we believe this approach provides a more complete picture of each MIPS eligible clinician’s scope of practice and provides more access to data about specialties and subspecialties not currently captured in PQRS” (page 468)
“We desire all-payer data for all submission mechanisms, to create a more comprehensive picture of the practice performance. Section 1848(q)(5)(H) of the Act authorizes the Secretary to include, for purposes of quality measurement and performance analysis, data submitted by MIPS eligible clinicians with respect to items and services furnished to individuals who are not Medicare beneficiaries. As discussed in section II.E.5.b. of this final rule with comment period, we are finalizing our proposal to require MIPS eligible clinicians to report allpayer data on quality measures where possible.” (pg1396)
CMS will be accepting comments for 60 days, however the online comment portal is not yet open as far as we can determine. Stay tuned!