Be There! New Jersey Doctor-Patient Alliance Inaugural Summit

You will not want to miss this summit on February 8-9, 2019!

IP4PI’s own Craig M. Wax, D.O. will join an all star lineup as a featured speaker. Dr. Wax will share reform priorities that will help put doctors and patients back in the driver’s seat. It is time to put and end to the shenanigans politicians pull to hand advantages to their crony buddies in the hospital industrial complex. Patients and their physicians must team up to reclaim their rights, increase the availability, and slash the cost of high quality care.

Coming soon to an EHR near you: Downtime and Missing Patient Data

Electronic Health Records are often full of bloat and incorrect data, except when they are not accessible at all and/or relevant patient data isn’t even entered into the system. Here’s a frightening note from management sent to “providers” in one health system earlier this week:

Subject: Downtime Message to Providers
To the Health Network Medical Staffs :

On December 12 from approximately 7:30-10 AM the entire network experienced a EHR unplanned outage. It was due to a server issue in Kansas City and affected several customers. The Issue was identified quickly and remedied. We were back up in under 2 hours.

We identified the fact that data from the EHR had not transferred since Nov 16th. We failed to actively monitor that transaction so did not know that data transfer had failed. The data transfer issue has been fixed by our EHR vendor and we are putting a process in place to assure that the monitoring of the transmission of data happens without fail.

Your IS team understands that this impacted your workflow and we apologize. We continue to work toward no disruption in information flow at all times.

Chief Medical Information Officer

10 Reasons to ‘Refuse to Enroll’ in Obamacare

From our friends at Citizen’s Council for Health Freedom:

OPEN ENROLLMENT 2018: 10 Reasons to ‘Refuse to Enroll’ in Obamacare

‘Command and Control,’ ‘Claw Backs,’ ‘Narrow Networks’ and More Are Reasons to Stay Out of an Expensive, Privacy-Compromising Gov’t Plan.

Just a few days remain in the open enrollment period for the Affordable Care Act (ACA), and for those still on the fence, Citizens’ Council for Health Freedom (CCHF) is sharing the top 10 reasons to “Refuse to Enroll.”

“For more than eight years, the Affordable Care Act has been changing America’s health care landscape—and not for the better,” said CCHF president and co-founder Twila Brase. “Costs have skyrocketed because younger, healthier Americans wisely chose not to enroll, unlike the Obamacare architects thought they would. Health plans that were already making money hand over fist received bailouts for insuring older, sicker individuals, some with uninsurable conditions. With a new administration that’s making bold steps against the ACA way of doing health care, there are many reasons not to enroll in a flawed government system that compromises care, ties doctors’ hands and shares our private medical information.”

CCHF’s “10 Reasons Not to Enroll in Obamacare” include the following:

  1. Obamacarecoverage is a government program; not private insurance.
  2. It’s “a second Medicaid-style program,” said former CBO director Douglas Holtz-Eakin.
  3. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) exchanges facilitate redistribution of American’s wages, reported Fox News in 2010, just days after the law was signed.
  4. User fees added to premiums fund operations of these ‘command and control’ exchanges, according to an “Overview of Health Insurance Exchanges” from the Congressional Research Service.
  5. ACA exchanges may automatically enroll you in Medicaid, such as this story in Minnesota.
  6. If you underestimate your income, the IRS can ‘claw back’ premium subsidies you received.
  7. Your choices are limited, as a result of “narrow networks” of doctors and hospitals.
  8. Federal law and most states no longer penalize you for refusing to buy insurance.
  9. Health care sharing is a more affordable, cash-based option for coverage.
  10. The federal exchange database (“Health Insurance Exchange Program” System of Records) collects, stores and shares private information from all enrollees.

For many years, CCHF has also shared a list of wise—and legal—alternatives to signing up for costly government coverage:

  1. Buy private insurance outside the government exchanges, such as a private policy, employer-sponsored coverage or a private insurance exchange.
  2. Claim one of several general exemptions to the mandate or one of its many hardship exemptions. The Trump administration added several hardship exemptions in April, including one related to abortion, and also announced earlier this month that documentation is not required for those who take these exemptions.
  3. Become a member of a health care sharing ministry, a viable, affordable option for some families that is skyrocketing in enrollment—and the second of the nine general exemptions.

“Americans also need to understand that although the mandate and penalty are gone in a practical sense, they are technically still in place,” said Brase. “While Congress zeroed out the penalty tax starting in 2019, Congress did not repeal the ACA mandate to be insured or the penalty itself. It only zeroed out the penalty for going uninsured. The language for the mandate and the penalty are still in law, but the cost of the penalty is now zero dollars. While this provides welcome relief to many, a future Congress could turn around and easily reinstate the penalty for being uninsured because the penalty language is still in law. They could simply go from zero to whatever penalty they wish to impose for going uninsured.”

Americans should also know that the individual penalty was zeroed out beginning in 2019, so those who went without coverage in 2018 may be still on the hook for penalties—and may still be able to claim exemptions to avoid those penalties.

For more information about CCHF, visit www.cchfreedom.org, its Facebook page or its Twitter feed @CCHFreedom. Also view the media page for CCHF here. For more about CCHF’s initiative The Wedge of Health Freedom, visitwww.JointheWedge.comThe Wedge Facebook page or follow The Wedge on Twitter @wedgeoffreedom.

Federal Judge Ends Mandatory AOA Membership Tied to Board Certification

“A federal judge in Camden has granted final approval to an $84 million settlement of an antitrust class action against the American Osteopathic Association,” related to the tying of AOA membership to the ability to maintain specialty certification through Osteopathic Continuous Certification, reported the New Jersey Law Journal on December 4, 2018.

The lawfirm leading the case, Duane Morris, LLC, earlier reported on what is in the settlement:

In addition to agreeing to end its practice of conditioning AOA board certification on purchasing annual membership in the AOA, which was at the center of the lawsuit, the AOA has also agreed to provide a host of other economic benefits to the more than 45,000 class members, such as:

  • for three years reducing its annual dues by $90 and
  • waiving a $90 board certification fee;
  • for two years offering AOA members two free CME courses of up to 12 aggregate credits;
  • contributing not less than $2 million to an osteopathic awareness campaign;
  • eliminating distinctions between online and in-person CME for purposes of AOA membership;
  • lifetime board certification is restored for all those certified prior 1997;
  • committee of independent private practice physicians will be created to represent independent practice considerations to the AOA board; and
  • physicians will not lose membership in the AOA as a result of failing to meet the CME requirement, provided that the physicians meet the CME requirements for the state(s) in which they practice.

Weighed against the uncertainty and expense of protracted litigation, the valuable benefits the AOA has agreed to provide to resolve the claims against it demonstrate that the settlement is in the best interest of the class and sub-classes, as well as the AOA, stated Duane Morris.

https://www.duanemorris.com/pressreleases/osteopathic_physicians_class_action_settlement_0718.html

For a full copy of the settlement agreements, see:
https://www.duanemorris.com/site/static/AOA_joint_motion_for_certification_0718.pdf

For a full history of the suit, see:
https://www.duanemorris.com/site/osteopathclassaction.html

Here is the wording from the motion on the key items:

The AOA is MIA as Insurers Marginalize Osteopathic Medicine

For more than a decade insurers have been implementing discriminatory policies that result in the automatic downcoding of claims filed by osteopathic physicians.

An official journal of the American Osteopathic Association recently published on this topic, but the osteopathic physicians on the front lines are asking the AOA to explain why it has been largely silent to this point and not taken meaningful action to stand up for the best interests of its members.

Here is a letter to the AOA Richard Koss, D.O. shared with IP4PI:

I hope you find the article in the recent DO magazine, dated November, 14, 2018, regarding the major insurers pushing back on the use of the modifier 25 as disturbing and discriminatory as I do.

What is the AAO’s policy, and plan to keep OMM specialists from being marginalized and discriminated out of existence? What is the economics committee doing to prevent this from happening? This has been going on for so long now (about 18 years) that there should be regular updates in all AAO communications about the membership’s ability to earn a living at their chosen profession. Where are these updates?

Yes I know that the AAO is under the AOA, but the AOA has no interest in protecting its members who practice OMM.

If you can’t get paid for your services than you do not exist. As OMM is being wiped off the payment rolls, the upcoming students and residents will have no way to pay back their loans, or make a living. So the existence of the AAO is also at stake here.

The beginnings of this trend started back in the 1950’s when the AOA leadership fought and pushed for full practice rights. That is to prescribe drugs and surgery. To do so they had to put OMM in the closet and denigrate it as a pseudoscience. This began the official death of Dr. Still’s Osteopathy. Now there are no Osteopathic hospitals, and all postgraduate programs are ACGME. Dr. Still is not even mentioned in the Academy Programs.

The AOA has known about the billing problems for 20 plus years and continues to be reactionary bending to the dictates of the AMA, and Federal Government, Insurance company mandates without any fight. This I can speak from personal experience. The modifier 25 issue has been going on for at least 18 years. Most recent in 2010 in Vancouver, Washington and Portland, Oregon. Then came the CMS illegal denial of the modifier 25 in the northeast in the last 2 years. Now this article in the DO……

I asked Mr. Goldman the head of the AOA PAC when he asked of PAC donations: “What is AOA policy and plan to support legislators and programs who support OMM?” His answer: “There is none.” The AOA has no plans or policies to keep OMM in its future business model (especially the “Branding advertisement”). Therefore it is up to the AAO to fight for our right to practice.

Please submit this communication to the board of trustees, governors, and I hope you publish this as an OP ED piece or letter to the editor of the AAO newsletters. To continue to be silent in this matter will condone the AOA’s current path.

Osteopathically,

Richard W. Koss, D.O., C-SPOMM, C-ACOFP

P.S. I hope I am not the only one who finds this disturbing. Is this even addressed in the “Five Year Plans” of the AAO? Because if it is not then we really are in trouble.

P.P.S. Of course the AOA is asleep at the wheel and has not done anything to help their members ability to make a living in their chosen profession. The AAO, our OMM specialty organization, also does not want to get involved. I pointed this out to both organizations on several occasions over the years and never gotten acknowledgement or communication on these issue, only “Crickets”. Thus I expect the same response to this letter.