This just in from eminent C19 pathologist Dr. Roger Hodgkinson:
Two papers published prior to COVID, and one with solid immunoflourescence experiments, demonstrated that lipid nanoparticles could have been expected to be taken up at high concentrations in the ovaries. In the animals (Merien et al), the concentration was so high the ovaries literally “glowed” at the time of dissection.
This suggests that Pfizer and Moderna and the regulatory agencies either knew or should have known, vaccines using lipid nanoparticles could threaten fertility and gynecological health if the particles carried a payload of mRNA coding for the dangerous GOF Wuhan Spike protein.
As a family physician, medical reporter, independent practice doctor who sees patients and helped pioneer COVID19 early treatment protocols, there are many things you must consider. First, natural immunity following COVID infection must be recognized as contributing toward herd immunity. People with natural immunity should be exempted from receiving COVID New Vaccines since they are contraindicated as they may cause potentially severe disease in the form of antibody-dependent enhancement, the worst of which won’t be seen for years. Second, the vaccine experiment is not for everyone, but should be reserved for those at highest risk over 70 years old and in nursing homes. Vaccine risk to healthy adults, children, and pregnant women far outweighs any possible benefit. Third, the principle of bodily autonomy and informed consent were never properly executed for anyone receiving this experimental intervention. Therefore, pharmaceutical industry should be 100% responsible for any adverse outcomes, monetarily and legally. Informed consent must be thoroughly and completely detailed and documented for all involved immediately. Fourth, these so-called vaccines have unproven long-term safety and should not become approved for use at this time until years of study can be completed, Last, because early treatment works and was blocked by nefarious corporations, hospitals, pharmaceutical manufacturers, media, and government entities, the emergency use authorization EUA for vaccines and Remdesivir should be immediately withdrawn. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Best Health Craig M. Wax DO Family physician Independent physicians for patient independence IP4PI
I’ve long felt that administrative tribunals set up to judge the validity of a vaccine exemption are precisely this: practicing medicine without a license. CA has been doing this with childhood vaccinations for some time, increasingly squeezing and attempting to strong-arm physicians who write exemptions. It is wrong.
These tribunals also violate CA law by practicing medicine without having done what the law calls a “good faith medical evaluation,” which I am sure is likewise required by other state’s laws. What they actually do is slavishly apply some list that the CDC published to specific cases. But there is no reason to believe that the CDC list is comprehensive, given the individual variation and patient-specific factors that are found everywhere in medicine. It is in part because each patient is unique that physicians — until recently — are generally granted wide discretionary latitude in patient care.
Practice guidelines published by the CDC or professional societies are not recipe books for the practice of medicine. They are general guidelines, nothing more. Clinical prudence is always required to apply evidence and principles to specific cases, and no guidelines are sufficiently comprehensive to cover all cases or include all statistical outliers. What we see here represents an egregious example of a trend in medicine toward homogenization that will not have salutary consequences.
For most email apps, clicking here will open a new message. Feel free to customize the template wording to your liking. After you’re happy with it, add your name at the bottom and send.
If the above link doesn’t work for you, template text is provided below:
Subject: No Vaccine Mandate
Dear President Holloway,
I respectfully ask you to reconsider and reverse the COVID vaccine mandate being imposed on Rutgers students wishing to return to in person learning.
Although, at first glance, the policy may seem prudent, it coerces students into bearing unneeded and unknown risk and is at heart contrary to the bedrock medical principle of informed consent. Also, a blanket mandate will harm many college students, including those who have already had COVID-19, those who are pregnant, those with coagulopathies and many more with short term and long term health consequences.
For additional medical, ethical, and legal reasons the mandate should be reversed, I urge you to read the following letters from doctors and attorneys who have closely analyzed the issue.