Anti-MOC Victories at Michigan State Medical Society House of Delegates

Friend of IP4PI Dr. Meg Edison writes in:

Michigan State Medical Society House of Delegates was last weekend, Martin Dubravec and I ran around like crazy, testifying in support of 4 anti-MOC resolutions and against a resolution to join the FSMB Compact. The outcome was very successful:

  1. The delegates reaffirmed strong opposition to the FSMB Compact (making me very happy, since it was my resolution from 2 years ago that we oppose the compact).
  2. We passed a resolution to engage legal counsel to investigate anti-trust violations against ABMS/insurers/hospitals in Michigan.
  3. We passed a resolution calling for an end to the direct-to-consumer advertising of the ABMS MOC product.
  4. We passed a resolution calling for public access to initial board certification status on ABMS websites.
  5. A resolution asking the AMA to amend their MOC policy to require informed consent from patients before conscripting them into ABMS MOC QI projects was referred to the board for more study, disappointing…but not surprising given how many academics are delegates. Ken Fisher was on the committee that heard this, he fought like mad and got it approved…but the delegates extracted it and referred it to the board on the house floor. Still, the conversation on the ethics of MOC & research was started.

I’ve attached the resolutions (see links embedded in list above) for your future reference if you’d like to share and pass similar resolutions in your state medical societies. I want to point out, it is a small handful of us (me, Martin Dubravec, Ken Fisher). There were no other docs testifying. We don’t need an army to make change…just a few can do this. Yes, it’s a pain to give up a few hours on Saturday, these meetings are confusing and intimidating, but find a friend, become delegates and make this happen.
-Meg

I’ll add a 6th victory that came from years of getting the right people involved in organized medicine and our House of Delegates…

6.) On the same page as the “Oppose IMLC” resolution attached below, the resolution 24-17 to “study single payer” was “amended” to remove all language on “single payer” and approved with broad language to study all alternative payment models…which includes DPC and other free market innovations. Just 3 years ago, this same body voted to approve single payer…we’ve come a long way.

Advertisements

Who does “Organized Medicine” work for?  Follow. The. Money.

With a significant portion of their physician constituency opposing the misnamed Affordable Care Act, i.e. Obamacare, and set to be harmed by bureaucracy-laden MACRA regulations why are some of the biggest names in “organized medicine” out in front cheering on these harmful programs?

Follow. The. Money.

The American College of Physicians has received about $3.5 Million in taxpayer funds from the federal government since 2011:
https://www.usaspending.gov/Pages/AdvancedSearch.aspx?sub=y&ST=C,G,L,O&FY=2016,2015,2014,2013,2012,2011&A=0&SS=USA&RN=American%20College%20of%20Physicians

The AMA $5.4 Million (not including CPT royalties):
https://www.usaspending.gov/Pages/AdvancedSearch.aspx?sub=y&ST=C,G,L,O&FY=2016,2015,2014,2012,2011&A=0&SS=USA&RN=american%20medical%20association

And this is “chump change,” explains Dr. Meg Edison, compared to the $86 Million taxpayer dollars the American Academy of Pediatrics raked in. “No wonder they were hashtagging the heck out of #VoteKids at election time. It’s a big business.”
https://www.usaspending.gov/Pages/AdvancedSearch.aspx?sub=y&ST=C,G,L,O&FY=2016,2015,2014,2013,2012,2011&A=0&SS=USA&RN=American%20academy%20of%20pediatrics

Bob Doherty, Exec. Dir. of ACP retorts that the taxpayer dollars “to help docs improve quality isn’t a COI but core to ‘ mission to promote excellence in medicine.”

“Helping docs improve quality” is apparently a euphemism for training physicians to comply with the crushing burdens of ACA and MACRA, a program passed in the name of “quality” but which ultimately punishes physicians for practicing individualized patient care, instead of cook book medicine as defined by CMS policy-wonks.

A sizable chunk of the funds flowing to ACP is ACA-driven funding “to help health providers achieve large-scale transformation” and “ensure sustainability” of these efforts.

With these large sums of money flowing into the coffers of those supposedly representing America’s physicians and their patients, it’s past time for hard questions to be asked and answered. Whose interests is “organized medicine” really looking out for? A hint: it’s not physicians or patients…