Michigan State Medical Society House of Delegates was last weekend, Martin Dubravec and I ran around like crazy, testifying in support of 4 anti-MOC resolutions and against a resolution to join the FSMB Compact. The outcome was very successful:
The delegates reaffirmed strong opposition to the FSMB Compact (making me very happy, since it was my resolution from 2 years ago that we oppose the compact).
A resolution asking the AMA to amend their MOC policy to require informed consent from patients before conscripting them into ABMS MOC QI projects was referred to the board for more study, disappointing…but not surprising given how many academics are delegates. Ken Fisher was on the committee that heard this, he fought like mad and got it approved…but the delegates extracted it and referred it to the board on the house floor. Still, the conversation on the ethics of MOC & research was started.
I’ve attached the resolutions (see links embedded in list above) for your future reference if you’d like to share and pass similar resolutions in your state medical societies. I want to point out, it is a small handful of us (me, Martin Dubravec, Ken Fisher). There were no other docs testifying. We don’t need an army to make change…just a few can do this. Yes, it’s a pain to give up a few hours on Saturday, these meetings are confusing and intimidating, but find a friend, become delegates and make this happen.
I’ll add a 6th victory that came from years of getting the right people involved in organized medicine and our House of Delegates…
6.) On the same page as the “Oppose IMLC” resolution attached below, the resolution 24-17 to “study single payer” was “amended” to remove all language on “single payer” and approved with broad language to study all alternative payment models…which includes DPC and other free market innovations. Just 3 years ago, this same body voted to approve single payer…we’ve come a long way.
Well, I guess now I have to respond point by point. I am staring at my wall, looking at the 2 AOA board certifications that I have. One is Family Practice and osteopathic manipulative treatment and the other is a separate, different certification called Special proficiency in osteopathic manipulative medicine, C-SPOMM. So, Yolanda, there are actually 3 certificates flying around NOT two. Now we have a residency so there is also Neuromusculoskelatal medicine/OMM. the Special Proficiency is NOT a FP certification. I should know, I didn’t just speak to somebody with 20 years experience, I actually possess these certificates and have been in practice for 30 years! there is no gold standard, just confusion created by the AOA and its various certifying boards. I didn’t say that insurance carriers or hospitals recognized any DO claiming to be a specialist in OMM, I just said that some FPs advertise themselves as such, thereby adding to the confusion for the public.
Yolanda you did offer to help with Aetna over a year ago – it just would have been nice to hear back on the issue. You sort of kept that to yourself until recently about 9-10 months later. Aetna is not the only insurance company that doesn’t recognize our OMM specialty. I have had problems with Connecticare, Empire in NY, Oscar/magnacare in NY in addition to Aetna in NY and CT. In fact none of the exchanges in NY recognize OMM but they do have acupuncture and chiropractic listed in EVERY exchange! Recently I even tried Liberty Health Share, a Christian healthcare cost sharing provider. They would have me contact them for approval first before every visit and then submit treatments plans like a PT because they don’t know what I do. You haven’t heard about other instances of this insurance problem because many DOs who do manipulation are not members of the AOA. Some doctors who completed their OMM residencies chose not to sit for the exam and many more have cash businesses as I did for the past 29 years. You also don’t have any outreach to folks like me so why would you hear from us. last summer I begged and pleaded for a specialty specific email blast for AOA members to no avail. You assume we will be contacted by our specialty boards but we are not and you assume that we will be contacted by our state societies but many of us are not members of those societies because they don’t serve our needs as traditional osteopaths. recently, at a meeting of the Bergen County osteopathic Society in NJ, it was suggested that perhaps this less than ideal treatment of physicians board certified in OMM might be because of our minority status within our own profession. Most AOA members are FPs and they have the loudest voice and the rest of us are a minority within a minority profession. Also that the creation of a board certification for manipulation may have been experienced by the FPs as a threat to their insurance reimbursement. Ultimately, the point is not that you are working on it but how does this kind of thing happen in the first place? OMM should be your top priority because that is what makes us different despite our small numbers. Continue reading →
IP4PI supporter Gina Reghetti, D.O. shares correspondence regarding continued attacks on the osteopathic profession.
Just a note to let you know that I received a letter today from the AOA, dated 1-9-2017 and signed by Jeffrey L. Weaver, O.D., yes, OD, not DO, an Optometrist who is the Vice President, Certifying Board Services, and from Eunice Lee, Associate Vice President, Client and Member Services, informing me that I have until February 1, 2017 to renew membership to keep my AOA board certification active. My board certification is wrongfully time-dated to expire in December 31st, 2022.
My scanner isn’t connecting to my PC wifi so I am unable to email the letter to you currently.
I called Jeffrey L. Weaver, O.D., this morning to confirm that he is not a DO, and I had a conversation with him for more than an hour regarding my views and concerns of the wrong agendas that the AOA has enforced on their doctors, such as re-certifications, and OCCs and membership dues connected to certifications. Continue reading →
IP4PI Physicians support the following resolutions for the legislative, executive and judicial branches of the US:
1. The full repeal, nullification or reconciliation of ACA/Obamacare as it was:
A. ACA passed by a partisan Congress (one party) by reconciliation. B. Changed by the executive branch 43 times without appropriate congressional action. C. Changed by SCOTUS to be a tax bill. D. Tax bills must originate in the House and ACA originated in the Senate. E. ACA has changed healthcare from a professional physician-patient interaction into merely an act of government HHS/CMS unelected bureaucratic compliance. F. ACA lead to an uncontrolled rise in costs for all citizens through increased taxes, insurance costs, hospital costs, physician costs, use of narrow networks and severely limited ACA approved options. G. IRS and tax penalties for any American citizens violate the US Constitution. H. Mutually accepted individual customer-vendor purchases are the ideal way to allow personal choice, encourage excellence and establish price competition for best citizen consumer value.Continue reading →
Stuart Damon, DO shares his recent correspondence with then-AOA President (now Immediate Past President) John Becher, DO:
From: Stuart Damon Date: April 13, 2016 To: John Becher Subject: Re: What makes you and me different?
Dr. Becher –
Thank you for your reply. I do appreciate your response.
With respect, a HOD resolution isn’t enough. From what I have heard so far, the ACOFP has forwarded a recommendation encouraging review of OCC. Tactically and strategically inadequate. OCC and recertification both need to be done away with by immediate action of the AOA leadership.
OCC and the manner in which came into being is a symptom of a larger problem (more to follow).
There are virtually no data that compare lifetime with time-limited diplomates; I have found two such studies. Neither involved a large sample space, and both demonstrated similar results: though the marker of quality was different between the two studies, there were no differences between lifetime and time-limited certification holders. Continue reading →
A group of the nation’s osteopathic doctors – including IP4PI founder, Craig M Wax, DO, along with Albert A. Talone, DO, Richard Renza, DO, and Roy Stoller, DO – filed suit against the American Osteopathic Association (AOA) to recover millions of dollars in annual membership fees that the doctors have been forced to pay for years to the organization. The money is paid as a condition of obtaining and maintaining physicians’ board certification in any advanced medical specialty. The physicians—who have filed the suit as a class action—contend that the requirement that they purchase memberships is illegal, has no reasonable connection to the advanced certification and violates the antitrust laws.
I would like to take few moments of your time and share with you some ideas on MOC/OCC and board re-certification exams. As a fellow physician and a Son of Dr. A.T. Still, we all share similar concerns. Our burden is to be true and faithful to our profession and to serve the needs of our patients honestly.
As an Osteopathic Physician like many in my situation, I completed my Osteopathic Internship, and participated in an ACGME anesthesia residency program which makes us uniquely qualified to be board certified by the AOA AOBA, ABMS ABA and The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, FRCPC (Canada). All three are fully respected and recognized in the USA. As a matter of fact, in my training program at USC we had many doctors from Canada who were certified by the FRCPC and were fully incorporated with a full Professorship status. The FRCPC has always been a Life-Time board certification process. Now, recently, last year, ABA has also re-adopted the Life-Time board certification process and dropped the EVERY-10-YEARS re-certification exam. Continue reading →