Malpractice Costs Will Soar if NPs are Deemed On Par With Physicians

Dear Administrator Verma,

Deeming non-physicians to be essentially equal in training and experience to physicians amounts to a dangerous experiment on American patients. It is improper and unethical for the federal government to be making such decisions regarding the scope of practice of medical professionals.

I have spent over 40 years as a complex litigation specialist. Handling over 35,000 malpractice claims. It seems the law of unintended consequences is at play. Currently the “Captain of the Ship” doctrine limits liability to allied health personnel. It also limits professional and legal liability costs. Placing nurse practitioners and Physician assistants on par will indeed lead to greater claim frequency and increased legal costs. Rates for all providers will increase. In fact underwriters will increase offices with PA’s and NP’s. We could see malpractice costs for internal medicine practices rise from $1-3,000 to $9-12,000 per allied health professional .

We saw the law of unintended consequences occur with EHR and once down that “rabbit hole” there is no return. There is both a patient and physician expense that has not been calculated.

Likewise it is irrational and counterproductive to pay a minimally trained person the same as a highly trained, experienced person. If the reimbursement is the same for poor quality as for good quality, but the poor quality costs less to provide, the entities that degrade quality have a competitive economic advantage. Medicare’s existing price controls are already impeding patient access to high quality care and should not be exacerbated by additional flawed policies that further disregard important differences between practitioners. 

The bottom line is that patients’ lives are at risk. The federal government should follow a policy of “first do no harm.” It violates this principle to impose top-down edicts declaring that non-physicians are qualified to practice medicine. I urge the federal government to reject such policies.

Peter Leone

President, Edge Professional Liability Services https://edgepro.net/

2 thoughts on “Malpractice Costs Will Soar if NPs are Deemed On Par With Physicians

  1. I am a physician. I am concerned about tissues surrounding APRN practice. There are some issues regarding APRN practice and malpractice I do not understand. I know that many APRNs get only 100k/300k coverage, and pay 1-2,000 for this. Even in Full practice authority states, where there is no “captain of the ship” it appears from what I can find that the cost of their malpractice premiums is FAR less than similar for physicians. I don not understand how this can be. It also appears that , despite ample opportunities, there are relatively few suits filed against them. How can this be? What am I not understanding here?

  2. I am a physician. I am concerned about tissues surrounding APRN practice. There are some issues regarding APRN practice and malpractice I do not understand. I know that many APRNs get only 100k/300k coverage, and pay 1-2,000 for this. Even in Full practice authority states, where there is no “captain of the ship” it appears from what I can find that the cost of their malpractice premiums is FAR less than similar for physicians. I don not understand how this can be. It also appears that , despite ample opportunities, there are relatively few suits filed against them. How can this be? What am I not understanding here?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.